In 2017, the biggest prospect of new education policy was seen. Prior to this, education policy was enacted nationally in 1968, 1986 and 1992. TSR Subramanyam chaired the committee for the formation of the policy, in May 2016, submitted its draft to the Union Human Resource Development Minister. As soon as they put it on the official website, the protesters became active, the new suggestions came forward too. The new ministers came and the government decided to make another committee. Thereafter a committee was formed under the chairmanship of scientific doctor Kasturirangan. Under which it was said that the new education policy will be by December 2017.
There are countless expectations from the new education policy. In the new policy we will have to find answers to questions related to the loss of government schools, teachers' level, privatization and commercialization, resources, innovation and quality related issues at all levels. Quality will be considered as complete only when it gives skill development and personal development to more than just the importance that today is given in the system of getting enough knowledge to score marks. In many states of the country, the fate of lakhs children is ruined due to imitation of exams and experimental examinations. In this direction, there is now a possibility of improvement after new technology has arrived. The concept of improvement will be realized only in the examination in 2018.
Laxity is the biggest negative aspect of pedagogy. The appointment of the elite Chancellors of several central universities took a long time. Lack of valuable education and the consequences of its degradation in daily life are now seeing up to the top. Concerns are made on the issue of the absence of Indian institutions in global multiplication. For the first time, the Ministry gave structure and formation to its ranking system. NAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council) has been made more effective by making large scale changes in the procedure. National Professor Training Council (NCTE), which reached the lower level of its credit, also gave evidence of adventure and homosexuality this year. A situation has to be stopped for about one thousand fake teacher training institutes. Now only two years or four-year training programs for teacher training will be accepted. The National Institute of Open Educational (NIOS) has started the work of providing 'online' training to 15 lakh teachers, all of whom have a dope.
CBSE will now have more time to carry out its responsibilities, because the government has made the right decision to free it from additional burden of qualifying exams and national level has recognized the formation of a new body for such examinations. The provisions like visitor teachers and educationists could not be terminated. If there are not enough teachers in the education institutes, then the quality improvement will be considered as disproportionate. The University Grants Commission (UGC) is concerned about the whole year for two reasons. One, what is his future? Secondly, there should not be a chairman for about eight months and not being appointed in a vice-presidential post for more than a year.
There is a lot of excitement about the central government's decision to create 20 international universities. The appointment of presidents / directors / chieftains of the organizations should be announced one month before their vacancy. On the other hand, it is also inappropriate to apply the new pay scale to the higher education institutions after the seventh pay scale. The level of school education can be improved only in a broad perspective, while the state governments will honestly show commitment to the transparent process of appointing teachers. The biggest challenge is against educational institutions, where teachers and students interact with knowledge, creation and understanding, and evaluate and innovate its useful prospects for the general public.